Should a prophet also be a theologian? In many charismatic circles, this question might sound odd. We prize the fresh word, the direct download, the unbridled voice of the Spirit. Yet, all too often, this emphasis on raw revelation eclipses the equally crucial need for prophets to be grounded in the solid foundation of biblical doctrine.

‍

This isn’t a new tension. From the early days of Pentecostalism, there’s been a tendency to equate formal theological education with a quenching of the Spirit. An accurate word, a visionary experience, or a dramatic healing – these were often seen as trumping the need for careful study and reasoned interpretation of Scripture. But is this a biblical model?

‍

Consider the prophets of the Old Testament. Were they merely charismatic figures delivering isolated pronouncements? Far from it! They were deeply conversant with the Law, the Psalms, and the history of Israel. They knew the covenants God had made with His people, and they tirelessly called them back to faithfulness when they strayed. Their prophecies weren’t floating in a vacuum; they were firmly anchored in the revealed Word of God.

‍

The same holds true in the New Testament. The apostles, often functioning as prophets themselves, were steeped in the Old Testament Scriptures and were able to articulate and defend the core doctrines of the Christian faith. They didn’t shy away from controversy or difficult theological questions; instead, they engaged with them thoughtfully and prayerfully, always seeking to align their understanding with the teachings of Jesus and the guidance of the Holy Spirit.

‍

So, what does this mean for us today? It means we must resist the temptation to elevate spiritual gifting above biblical literacy. We must encourage those who are called to prophetic ministry to immerse themselves in the study of Scripture, to engage with sound theological resources, and to submit their insights to the scrutiny of the wider church community.

‍

It means that we need to challenge the notion that a prophet’s “anointing” somehow excuses a lack of accountability or a disregard for established doctrine. True spiritual authority is not based on charisma or personal experience alone, but on a life that is consistently submitted to the will of God as revealed in His Word.

‍

In short, let’s embrace a more holistic view of prophetic ministry – one that values both the power of the Spirit and the authority of Scripture, recognizing that true revelation will always align with truth, and that the most effective prophets are those who are not only gifted but also grounded in the profound realities of the Christian faith.

‍